The single most valuable conversion mechanism on this site is the coverage check, but it is bleeding value because the primary CTA is diluted by competing CTAs and the form asks for email and phone before any value is shown, while the page's performance (LCP 35.5s) and trust signals (missing guarantee, fee disclosure) further erode conversion.


Lab LCP of 35.5s on mobile means most visitors bounce before seeing content.


Lab CLS of 0.731 on mobile causes layout shifts, leading to mis-taps on CTAs.


Lab TBT of 1,920 ms on mobile makes the page unresponsive, delaying interactions.


Homepage loads 64 scripts, causing slow interaction readiness on mobile.


Two nearly identical plans pages split conversion traffic and confuse users about the canonical URL.

Check coverage
Enter your ZIP to check coverage and pricing instantly.
CHECK COVERAGELead form collects email, ZIP, phone before any coverage or pricing value is shown, creating friction.
Gathered from third-party reviews, forums and video — the site’s own pages are excluded. Every quote was verified word-for-word against the page it links to; anything that could not be verified was discarded rather than paraphrased.
confusing (and often changing!) terms of service.
consumers can “Cancel Anytime”, “Join America’s Largest Wireless Internet Provider Featuring” amongst other features “Nationwide Coverage” and “No Installation Required” based on conflicting complaints received by BBB.
when I cancelled my service they continued to charge me and refused to close my account and stop charging unless I return the modem that I purchased and telling me I was renting it when I know I purchased it.
impossible to talk to human support..all chat and text doesn't get anything solved.
They charged us two "service fees" of $249 and $199, with no explanation and continued requests get ignored.
Each surface starts at 100. The worst issue costs its full penalty — Urgent 25, High 12, Medium 5 — and each further issue costs 30% less than the one before, because the fifth problem on a page does not damage it as much as the first.
| Surface | Urgent | High | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 1 | 3 | 57 | F |
| Page | 0 | 5 | 68 | D |
| Area | 0 | 1 | 88 | B |
Grades: A 90+, B 80+, C 70+, D 60+, F below 60.
The sum of every finding's individual range. Each row is traffic × conversion × assumed lift band × order value:
| Finding | Lift band | Range |
|---|---|---|
| LCP 35.5s on mobile | 2.0–8.0% | 0–0/1k |
| Lab CLS of 0.731 on mobile | 1.0–5.0% | 0–0/1k |
| Lab TBT of 1,920 ms on mobile | 1.0–5.0% | 0–0/1k |
| Heavy third-party script load | 1.0–5.0% | 0–0/1k |
| Duplicate plans pages split traffic | 0.5–2.0% | 0–0/1k |
| Savings form asks contact before value | 1.0–5.0% | 0–0/1k |
| Coverage CTA and form mismatch | 1.0–5.0% | 0–0/1k |
| No guarantee or return policy | 1.0–5.0% | 0–0/1k |
| Misleading claims undermine credibility | 1.0–5.0% | 0–0/1k |
| Price shown without fee disclosure | 1.0–5.0% | 0–0/1k |
No traffic or order-value figures were supplied, so the total is a per-1,000-visitor rate against an assumed 2% baseline. Supply real figures and this becomes a dollar range.
Caveat that applies to every row: Across 127,000 experiments, 12% produced a statistically significant improvement on the primary metric; a healthy programme win rate is 10-30%. These are prizes if changes work, not forecasts.
A verified finding was measured directly — real-user field data, security headers, accessibility defects counted in the markup — and is reproducible by anyone. Everything else is expert inspection: valuable, but a hypothesis until tested.